Legislative elections

Red scare rhetoric

“The two extremes lead to civil war,” French President Emmanuel Macron said this week, ahead of Sunday's parliamentary elections. He was referring to the far-right National Rally party (RN) and the leftwing party France Unbowed (LFI), which is part of a new broad left-wing alliance. A strategy which equates both parties as “extreme”, with the goal of convince French voters that his centrist coalition represents the only reasonable choice.

This rhetoric of 'me or chaos' began after his abrupt decision to dissolve the National Assembly on the night of the European election results. Since then, Macron has focussed most of his attacks on the left, drawing vocabulary from the reactionary right to discredit the new leftwing alliance. His main target has been Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the controversial leader of LFI, who has been relentlessly accused of antisemitism due to his staunch defence of Palestinians.

The demonisation campaign is not new in Macron's presidency, who has repeatedly positioned himself as the only credible alternative to the far right. This was stirred further following October 7, with attacks from all sides to tar LFI with the brush of antisemitism. This 'red scare' has grown in parallel with excessive media coverage of the RN in recent months.

Macron's strategy is clear: attacking the left before dealing with the far right. With the election held in two rounds, he aims to discredit the left in the hope of diminishing their impact in the first round and securing as many duels as possible against the far right in the second round, positioning his party as a beacon of 'stability.' However, this approach carries a significant risk: by casting the left in a light as “bad” as the far right, it may compromise the chances of uniting various forces to defeat the RN in the second round.

We use cookies

We use cookies to improve user experience. Choose what cookies you allow us to use. You can read more about our Cookie Policy in our Privacy Policy.